sorry about the small print…

Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition

John T. Jost

Stanford University

Jack Glaser

University of California, Berkeley

Arie W. Kruglanski

University of Maryland at College Park

Frank J. Sulloway

University of California, Berkeley

Analyzing political conservatism as motivated social cognition integrates theories of personality (authoritarianism,

dogmatism–intolerance of ambiguity), epistemic and existential needs (for closure,

regulatory focus, terror management), and ideological rationalization (social dominance, system justification).

A meta-analysis (88 samples, 12 countries, 22,818 cases) confirms that several psychological

variables predict political conservatism: death anxiety (weighted mean r  .50); system instability (.47);

dogmatism–intolerance of ambiguity (.34); openness to experience (–.32); uncertainty tolerance (–.27);

needs for order, structure, and closure (.26); integrative complexity (–.20); fear of threat and loss (.18);

and self-esteem (–.09). The core ideology of conservatism stresses resistance to change and justification

of inequality and is motivated by needs that vary situationally and dispositionally to manage uncertainty

and threat.

download the pdf here. 

http://www.wam.umd.edu/~hannahk/bulletin.pdf

Advertisements

Leave a comment

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Palestine Summer Encounter
  • www.myspace.com/palestine
  • Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator
  • Awaken yourself, click here
  • Palestine Blogss - The Gazette